Sunway’s Takeover Of IJM Needs Review
Sunway Bhd’s proposed RM11 billion acquisition of IJM Corporation is one of the largest corporate deals in Malaysia in recent years. However, with government-linked investment companies (GLICs) holding 43.88% of IJM, the deal carries major implications for millions of Malaysians whose savings are managed by these institutions. Key shareholders include the Employees Provident Fund (EPF), KWAP, PNB-ASN and Yayasan Pelaburan Bumiputra. Their decision on the takeover will directly affect contributors and pensioners. Concerns Over Returns One major issue is whether the deal truly benefits GLIC beneficiaries. If the takeover proceeds, EPF’s stake would fall from 20.41% in IJM to about 7.3% in the enlarged Sunway group. Although Sunway’s market value would rise from RM38 billion to around RM50 billion, the expected earnings boost is modest — about 1%. Dividend income is another concern. Over the past six years, EPF received an average of RM50 million annually from IJM. In comparison, its current stake in Sunway generates around RM38 million — and this amount would likely decrease further after dilution. Given that these returns support retirement savings, the question arises: does the transaction genuinely enhance long-term value, or weaken it? Strategic Asset Implications Beyond financial returns, IJM owns strategic infrastructure assets such as highways and ports — assets that generate stable cash flow and are difficult to replace. Although GLICs would remain shareholders in the combined entity, their influence would be reduced. This raises concerns about whether Malaysia’s sovereign funds should dilute their control over proven national infrastructure assets. In today’s market, acquiring similar large-scale infrastructure assets is increasingly challenging. Once diluted, regaining such positions may not be easy. Need for Transparency This is not an argument against corporate consolidation. Strong and competitive Malaysian companies are important for economic growth. However, when a transaction involves retirement savings and public funds, it must undergo thorough scrutiny. The impact of dilution, dividend reductions and loss of strategic influence deserves careful review. Fiduciary Responsibility GLICs manage public trust. EPF alone safeguards the retirement savings of more than 15 million Malaysians. KWAP protects civil servants’ pensions, while PNB represents bumiputera investors. Their primary responsibility is to maximise sustainable long-term returns for beneficiaries. Given the scale of this transaction, transparency and open discussion are crucial. The central question remains: does this deal serve the best interests of contributors and pensioners, or would maintaining current stakes in IJM better protect their long-term value? GLICs must ensure their decisions prioritise fiduciary duty above all else, and clearly communicate how those decisions protect the rakyat’s financial future.









